Plaintiff-appellants challenged First Appellate Court orders deferring their applications to modify issues and lead further evidence. The High Court found no reason to interfere since the applications remained under consideration and dismissed the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) 17wp5450.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5450/2023
Sanjay Anandrao Chambhare and anr. .Vs. Vitthal Zinguji Fating and ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. A. De, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. R. R. Deo, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J. DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2024
Heard Mr. A. De, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. R. R. Deo, learned counsel for the respondent No.1.
(Anil L. Pansare, J.)
Kahale
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ interference was warranted where the First Appellate Court deferred decision on applications to amend issues and lead further evidence until final hearing?
Sanjay Anandrao Chambhare
Vitthal Zinguji Fating
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
