A writ petition concerning an order in a change report was disposed of after counsel reported the sole respondent's death and stated the petition would not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
82-WP-5424.23.docx
Gayatri
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5424 OF 2023
Bhartiya Gyan Vardhini Sabha
Registered Trust Thr. its Trustee … Petitioner
Vs.
Kedar Rameshwar Singh Tapasvi ...Respondent
Mr. Nilesh Wable, Advocate for Petitioner.
Ms. Pranali P. Railkar i/b. Mr. Ajay A. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 5th FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.
respondent has expired. He submits that since the petition arises out of order passed in a change report, the petition will not survive in view of the death of the respondent.
Digitally signed GAYATRI by GAYATRIRAJENDRA RAJENDRA SHIMPI SHIMPI Date:2024.02.07 15:33:24 +0530
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
1/1
Bhartiya Gyan Vardhini Sabha Registered Trust Thr. its Trustee
Kedar Rameshwar Singh Tapasvi
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
