Disposed

Jayshri D/O Rameshrao Bokade v. the State of Maha., Thr. Its Secretary, Dept. of Secondary and Higher Secondary Edu., Mumbai

Bombay HC12 Mar 2024WP/4960/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition concerning approval of a teacher's appointment and her subsequent absorption was disposed of based on joint settlement pursis. Management to submit fresh approval proposal and absorption proposal; Education Officer directed to decide within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Management to submit fresh approval proposal within 10 days, then absorption proposal; Education Officer to decide approval within six weeks.

Jayshri D/O Rameshrao Bokade Vs the State of Maha… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 911 wp 4960-2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.4960/2021

¶4

Ku. Jayshri d/o Rameshrao Bokade

¶5

Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, Mumbai and others

¶7

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions

¶8

and Registrar's orders

¶9

¶10

Shri A.Z. Jibhkate, Advocate for petitioner

¶11

Shri Hrishikesh Marathe, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2

¶12

Shri K.S. Ganorkar, Advocate for respondent No.3

¶13

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.. DATED : 12/03/2024

¶14

The petitioner and respondent No.3 have jointly filed a settlement pursis dated 09/02/2024 signed by petitioner and respondent No.3 as well as their respective counsel. It is stated in the settlement pursis that the respondent No.3 is ready and willing to submit fresh proposal of approval along with all necessary documents, seeking approval to the appointment of petitioner as a Shikshan Sewak initially for three years from the date of her appointment and thereafter onward, to the respondent No.2 i.e. Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Wardha within 10 days from the date of order. It is further stated that, thereafter proposal for absorption of the petitioner in any other school, along with service book recording required entries from the date of appointment till date and all necessary documents, since post of Assistant Teacher is not presently vacant in the schools run by the

¶15

2 911 wp 4960-2021

¶16

respondent No.3 Management, shall be submitted within 10 days to the respondent No.2.

¶17

The petitioner at the same time agreed not to make any monetary claim from the respondent Nos.1 and 2 i.e. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education and the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Wardha as well as from the respondent No.3 i.e. Saraswati Mata Vidya Prasarak Mandal, Thanegaon, till her absorption.

¶18

The respondent No.2 Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Wardha has filed a separate pursis dated 15/01/2024, in light of order dated 24/07/2023 passed in Writ Petition No.1158/2020 and submits that in case a fresh proposal is submitted by the respondent No.3 Management before the Education Officer, (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Wardha, the same will be decided within stipulated period.

¶19

In light of above, both the pursis namely, joint settlement pursis of the petitioner and respondent No.3 Management dated 09/02/2024 and the purisis dated 15/02/2024, filed by the respondent No.2, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶20

Parties have directed to act upon their statement made in the respective pursis.

¶21

The respondent No.2 Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Wardha is directed to decide the proposal as regards grant of approval to the

¶22

3 911 wp 4960-2021

¶23

appointment of petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of said proposal by the respondent No.3 Management as per joint pursis dated 09/02/2024.

¶24

JUDGE JUDGE

¶25

R.S. Sahare

Jayshri D/O Rameshrao Bokade v. the State of Maha., Thr. Its Secretary, Dept. of Secondary and Higher Secondary Edu., Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayshri D/O Rameshrao Bokade v. the State of Maha., Thr. Its Secretary, Dept. of Secondary and Higher Secondary Edu., Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Semana Vidya Va Van Vikas Prashiks Vs Union of India Acting Thr. Secretary for Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi and Ors.

Murlidhar S/O Lahanuji Khangar Vs Deputy Collector Land Acquisition (General) and Competent Authority N.H., Land Acquisition

Vasant Sitaramji Avthale and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Akash Ramchandra Jakkulwar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Bhaskar S/O Janardhanrao Vaidya Vs the State of Maha., Thr. Secy., (Employment Guarantee Scheme), Dept. of Planning, Mumbai and Ors.

Hiwaraj Shankar Waghmare and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mumbai and Others