Nandkishore Tukaram Rekhate v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secy., Co-Op. Marketing and Textile Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC10 Sept 2024WP/4958/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition regarding maintainability of a revision in a cooperative societies matter. Court noted a Co-ordinate Bench judgment holding reliance by respondent No.2 was per incuriam, issued notice returnable after three weeks, and permitted service on remaining respondents.

What the court decided

AI extract

Nandkishore Tukaram Rekhate vs the State of… — Cooperative Societies | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 72-WP4958-2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.4958 OF 2024

¶4

(NANDKISHORE TUKARAM REKHATE..VS..STATE OF MAH. THR. SECRETARY, COOP. MARKETING & TEXTILE DEPT. & OTH.)

¶5

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

- - - - Shri Vipul B. Bhise, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri Nitin Autkar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶8

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 10, 2024.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

Learned Counsel for petitioner points out in the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court dated 12/08/2024 in Writ Petition No.4900/2021 (Smt. Urmilabai wd/o Maroti Kale and Ors. Vs. the Registrar General and Additional Commissioner and Special Registrar, Co-operative Society, Pune and Ors.), this Court has observed that the judgment on which the respondent No.2 has relied upon to hold that the revision is not maintainable, is per incuriam. In that view of the matter, issue notice to the respondents, returnable after three weeks.

¶11

The learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶12

The petitioner(s) are permitted to serve the respondent Nos.5 to 7 by private mode, in addition to

¶13

2 72-WP4958-2024

¶14

regular mode of service, including service on the lawyer appearing before the trial Court and file affidavit of service by next date, failing which the petitioner(s) shall deposit costs of Rupees Five Hundred with High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur.

¶15

The office objections, if any, be removed before the returnable date.

¶16

JUDGE

¶17

RRaut..

¶18

Signed by: Raut (RR) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 13/09/2024 13:27:43

Nandkishore Tukaram Rekhate v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secy., Co-Op. Marketing and Textile Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Nandkishore Tukaram Rekhate v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secy., Co-Op. Marketing and Textile Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ratan Dagdu Kaware vs Sub Divisional Officer, Mehkar, Buldhana and Others

Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati vs Ganesh Gulabrao Nawale

Rajashree Ramdas Sapkal (Sau. Rajashree Ashok Borade) vs the Honble Minister, Ministry of Rural Development and Others

Mangala Balkrushna Uike vs Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Babita Wd/O Ashok Duge vs Ramji Keshav Duge, (Since Deceased), Thr. His Lrs. and Another

Rajkumar S/O Samayya Potte vs Deputy Conservator of Forest, Sironcha Forest Division, Sironcha, Gadchiroli