Petition challenged a Sub-Divisional Officer's remand order and the subsequent Naib-Tahsildar order. The Court held the challenge to the remand order was infructuous since a fresh order followed, and an appeal/revision remedy existed against the Naib-Tahsildar's order. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 3.wp4956.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 4956 OF 2024
Vijay Madhukarrao Devgirkar and Ors.
Vs.
Ranjan Gajanan Domkawle and Ors.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. A.V. Lokhande, Advocate for petitioners.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 24.10.2024.
This petition takes exception to the order dated 04.07.2022 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Hinghanghat, District – Wardha and the order dated 22.12.2023 passed by the Naib-Tahsildar in Revenue Case No.23/MCA-5/2022-23.
Prity
2 / 2 3.wp4956.2024
order, the learned Naib-Tahsildar has already passed the fresh order dated 22.12.2023. As regards the order passed by the learned Naib-Tahsildar dated 22.12.2023, admittedly there is a remedy of appeal/revision available to the petitioner.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
Prity
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable against the SDO's remand order when a fresh Naib-Tahsildar order exists and appeal/revision remedy is available.
Vijay Madhukarrao Devgirkar and Ors.
Ranjan Gajanan Domkawle and Ors.
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
