The petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.04.25 Chitra Sonawane. 09:44:31 1 501-WP-483-2024.doc +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Cri.Writ Petition No.483 of 2024
Sumit Babulal Rathod... Petitioner.
Versus
1. B.U. Bhandari Properties & Bhimashankar Developers Partner,
1) Rajnish Maniklal Bhandari2) Anuj Maniklal Bhandari3) Yash Rajnish Bhandari4) Shreyas Anuj Bhandari2. The State of Maharashtra … Respondents.
Mr Ravishankar Thombare for the petitioner.
Mr Arfan Sait, APP for respondent/State.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 24 April 2024.
P.C. :
Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
2.After hearing the matter for some time, the learned
Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this
petition. Leave granted as prayed for. The petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn.
[R. N. Laddha, J.]
Sumit Babulal Rathod
B.U. Bhandari Properties & Bhimashankar Developers Partner
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court