Kondiram Namdeo Patil v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed the petitioner to add the first informant, Kashinath Talekar, as a party-respondent in a writ petition seeking to quash a criminal case under Section 166-A IPC arising from an incident in 2009. The High Court stayed trial proceedings against the petitioner during the amendment process.
What did the court decide?
Leave to add the first informant, Kashinath Talekar as a party-respondent granted; stay on trial court proceedings against the petitioner.