Writ petition against the State and BMC; the matter was adjourned to enable the Government Pleader to seek instructions.
No decision on merits. The Court merely adjourned the writ petition at the request of the learned Government Pleader, who sought time to take instructions. The petition stands over for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 34-wp4766.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4766 OF 2024
Vikram Navinchandra Shah & Anr. …..Petitioners
Vs.
State Of Maharashtra & Ors. …..Respondents
Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w Adv. Mehul Shah and Adv. Abhishek Nikharge i/by Mr. Bharat Joshi for the Petitioners. Ms. Pushpa Yadav for the Respondent-BMC.
Smt. P.H. Kantharia, G.P. with Mr. Suraj Gupte AGP, for the RespondentState.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 3rd DECEMBER, 2024.
P.C.:-
instructions.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SANJIV SANJIV SHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2024.12.05 14:34:53 +0530
1/1
Vikram Navinchandra Shah
State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
