Disposed

Dnyaneshwar Dadaji Thaware v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC22 Oct 2024WP/4761/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench disposed of two writ petitions concerning transfers of school employees from unaided to aided sections, subject to petitioners affording an undertaking not to claim salary arrears beyond the last three years.

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed subject to undertaking not to claim salary arrears except for last 3 years on unaided posts.

Dnyaneshwar Dadaji Thaware Vs the State of… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:11946-DB

¶2

1 35) WP 4761-2022+.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 4761 OF 2022

¶5

DNYANESHWAR DADAJI THAWARE

¶6

...Vs...

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 969 OF 2022

¶10

RANJANA RAMBHAU KUBDE

¶11

...Vs...

¶12

STATE OF MAHA. THR. SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

¶13

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶14

Writ Petition No. 4761/2022

¶15

Shri Kaustubh Deogade, Advocate for petitioner. Shri M.J.Khan, AGP for respondents/State. Shri D.A. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for respondent no. 7. Writ Petition No. 969/2022 Shri D.A. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri M.J.Khan, AGP for respondents/State. Shri A.S.Manohar, Advocate for respondent no. 5.

¶16

CORAM: AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND

¶17

SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR, JJ.

¶18

DATED : 22^nd OCTOBER, 2024.

¶19

It is contended that the proposal of the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 4761/2022 for transfer from unaided to aided section has already been received by respondent no. 4, who in turn has forwarded the same to respondent no. 3 for consideration. The learned Asst. Govt. Pleader for respondents/State, upon instructions, makes a statement, that the said proposal shall be considered in terms of the policy and the law applicable.

¶20

2 35) WP 4761-2022+.odt

¶21

Insofar as the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 969/22 is concerned, the learned A.G.P. submits, that a proposal is not yet received, however, since the respondent no. 10 is appointed as an Administrator. She will examine the case of the petitioner in terms of Rule 41 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private School (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 (for short, ‘M.E.P.S. Rules’), for being transferred from unaided to aided section, since the post for teaching Marathi is vacant in the aided section and so also her eligibility and in case found to be positive, shall send a proposal to respondent no. 4, who upon being satisfied regarding the same, shall forward to the respondent no. 3 for further consideration, who thereupon shall decide the same.

¶22

In view of the aforesaid statement of the learned A.G.P., both these petitions are disposed, however, subject to the affidavit filed by petitioners, that they will not claim arrears of the salary except for last 3 years on the unaided posts.

¶23

The pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

¶24

(SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶25

B.T.Khapekar

Dnyaneshwar Dadaji Thaware v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dnyaneshwar Dadaji Thaware v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Axis Bank Ltd., Thr. Its Authorized Officer, Nagpur Vs the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Mumbai and Ors.

Amreshkumar S/O Jagjeevan Singh vs Union of India Thr. the Secretary, Ministry of Coal New Delhi and Others

Udaram Kashiram Kapgate Vs the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Bhandara and Others

M/S National Building Construction, Nagpur Thr. Penmacha Varma and Another vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Finance Department, Mumbai and Ors.

Yadorao S/O Ishulal Rahangadale and Others vs Shri Anil Patil, Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gondia and Another

Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Mul, Chandrapur, Thr. President, Adv. Babasaheb Wasade and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Education, Mumbai and Others