A writ petitioner sought mutation of his name in revenue records on the basis of a registered Will, which legal heirs disputed as forged. Relying on Supreme Court guidance that disputes over title based on a Will must first be resolved in Civil Court, this Court declined to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 4619.2021.odt
2024:BHC-NAG:10152
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 4619 of 2021
[Narendra s/o Shamraoji Thele ..vs.. Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and ors.]
Mr. A. P. Kalmegh, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. S. N. Thakur, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 4 Mr. G. R. Sadar, Advocate for respondent nos. 5, 8 and 9
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.
DATED : 09-09-2024
The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders passed by the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati as also the Additional Collector, Amravati refusing to mutate the petitioner’s name in the revenue record.
2 wp 4619.2021.odt
(Anil L. Pansare, J.)
wasnik
1 issue framed by the court
Must a party claiming title under a registered Will obtain adjudication from the Civil Court before mutation of the revenue record can be directed?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jitendra Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and othersRelied on¶3
[2021 SCC OnLine SC 802] · Who else cites this
Narendra s/o Shamraoji Thele
Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati
Legal heirs of Mahadeorao Shinde (respondent nos. 5 to 9)
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
