Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. v. Dinkar Shivram Sutar
Bombay HCWP/4592/2001
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
wp.docx Iresh IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
231.4592.01 wp.docx
Iresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4592 OF 2001
The State of Maharashtra and another .....Petitioners
Vs.
Dinkar Shivram Sutar .....Respondent
Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP for the petitioner Ms. Rajlaxmi Punjabi i/b P. M. Bhansali for the respondent
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 18th JANUARY 2024.
P.C.
1. Learned AGP on instructions states that nothing survives in the
petition as the petition has become infructuous.
2. Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
1/1
The State of Maharashtra and another
Dinkar Shivram Sutar
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court