The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition based on written instructions placed on record. The Court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902.WP-448-2015.doc
2024:BHC-AUG:23448-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 448 OF 2015
SANGAMESHWAR SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, LATUR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Nimbalkar Aniruddha A GP for Respondents/State : Mrs. V.N. Patil Jadhav Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Tandale P.R. Advocate for Respondent No.1& 2 : Mr. Adwant S.V.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 01 OCTOBER 2024
PER COURT :
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.]
Najeeb..
SANGAMESHWAR SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, LATUR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
MANGESH S. PATIL
SHAILESH P. BRAHME
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
