Writ petition challenged an order condoning the delay in filing an appeal against mutation entries effected in 2017 and 2018. The court found the impugned order to be a reasoned one, noted that a civil suit between the parties was pending, and declined to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:8433
906-cwp-4430-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4430 OF 2024
Chintaman N. Nagpure ...Petitioner Versus Ramesh G. Buran & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. S.N. Dongre for the Petitioner. Mr. H.D. Marathe, AGP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 30 JULY 2024.
PC:-
1/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
906-cwp-4430-24.doc
transpired that the civil suit is pending between the parties. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. The Petition is dismissed.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
2/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Sub-Divisional Officer's order condoning delay in filing an appeal against mutation entries of 2017-2018 warranted interference.
Chintaman N. Nagpure
Ramesh G. Buran & Ors.
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
