Criminal writ petition was withdrawn at the petitioners' request, with liberty to seek stay before the Sessions Court where an appeal with a condonation of delay application is pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4 wp.436.24.odt
1
2024:BHC-NAG:5868
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.436 OF 2024
Ramesh S/o. Lakshaman Chekkapelly and others .Vs.
Naina W/o. Ramesh Chekkapelly and others
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr R. S. Kurekar, Advocate for the petitioners
CORAM : G.A. SANAP J. DATE : JUNE 10, 2024
Heard.
(G. A. SANAP, J)
Namrata
Ramesh S/o. Lakshaman Chekkapelly and others
Naina W/o. Ramesh Chekkapelly and others
G.A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
