Dismissed

Svc Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Throu. Mr. Kishor Narayan Satpute and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. District Magistrate and Orsx

Bombay HC16 Jan 2024WP/431/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Tehsildar/Respondent No. 2 to take physical possession of secured assets under an unimplemented Section 14 SARFAESI order dated 29.08.2008. Police assistance was mandated, and reporting for compliance was scheduled.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 to take physical possession of secured assets with police assistance and report compliance by 13.02.2024.

Svc Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Throu. Mr. Kishor Narayan… — Banking and Recovery | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed AARTI by AARTIGAJANAN GAJANAN PALKAR PALKAR Date:2024.01.17 15:13:49 +0530

¶2

48.WP.431.2024.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.431 OF 2024

¶5

SVC Co-Operative Bank Ltd. & Anr. …. Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents

¶8

Mr. Nikhil Rajani i/b. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Petitioners.

¶9

Mr. A.I. Patel a/w. Mrs.M.S. Bane, AGP for Respondent-State.

¶10

CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA &

¶11

SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.

¶12

DATE : JANUARY 16, 2024

¶13

P. C.

¶14

Mentioned. Taken out of turn.

¶15

The above Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to Respondent No.2 to execute and implement the order dated 29^th August, 2008 passed by the District Magistrate, Thane under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

¶16

We have failed to understand why this order has not been implemented for a period of approximately 16 years. Be that as it may, we direct that the Tehsildar, Thane/Respondent No.2 shall take

¶17

physical possession of the secured assets which form the subject

¶18

Page 1 of 3 JANUARY 16, 2024

¶19

Aarti Palkar

¶20

48.WP.431.2024.doc

¶21

matter of the Section 14 Order [more particularly described in Exhibit-A of the Petition] to the Petition. For the sake of convenience, the details of the secured assets of which physical possession is to be taken is reproduced hereunder:-

¶22

1) Land and building situated on Final Plot No.207, TPS No.1, admeasuring at about 500 sq.ft. out of 1400 sq.ft. on the property known as Mani Baug, L.B.S.Road, Damani Estate, Naupada, Village Panchpakhadi, Thane (W) with Plant and machinery installed therein.

¶23

2) Land and building situated on Final Plot No.207, TPS No.1, admeasuring at about 500 sq.ft. out of 900 sq.ft. on the property known as Mani Baug, L.B.S.Road, Damani Estate, Naupada, Village Panchpakhadi, Thane (W) with Plant and machinery installed therein.

¶24

To ensure that Respondent No.2 is in a position to take physical possession of the secured assets, we direct the Senior Police Inspector of the local Police Station to give all necessary assistance to Respondent No.2 [including deputing adequate number of police personnel] so that Respondent No.2 can take physical possession to the secured assets and hand over the same to the Authorized Officer of the Petitioner, failing which the concerned Senior Police Inspector shall be liable for contempt. All costs, charges and expenses payable for the aforesaid police assistance shall be paid by the Petitioners.

¶25

Page 2 of 3 JANUARY 16, 2024

¶26

Aarti Palkar

¶27

48.WP.431.2024.doc

¶28

The Authorized Officer of the Petitioners is also directed to

¶29

remain present at site on 9^th February, 2024 at 11.30 a.m. so that physical possession of the secured assets can be handed over to the Authorized Officer of the Petitioners.

¶30

Respondent No.2 shall immediately issue a notice to the borrowers informing them that possession of the secured assets will be taken on 9^th February, 2024. Respondent No.2 shall also forward a copy of this order alongwith the notice.

¶31

The above Writ Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

Though we have disposed of the above Writ Petition, we now place the above Writ Petition on board on 13^th February, 2024 for reporting compliance.

¶33

This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶34

[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] [B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

¶35

Page 3 of 3 JANUARY 16, 2024

¶36

Aarti Palkar

Svc Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Throu. Mr. Kishor Narayan Satpute and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. District Magistrate and Orsx

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Svc Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Throu. Mr. Kishor Narayan Satpute and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra Throu. District Magistrate and Orsx

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Iifl Home Finance Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Assistant Government Plader and Ors.

Hotel New Zelam Thr Its Proprietor and Ors. Vs Model Co. Op Bank Ltd. and Anr.

Sundaram Home Finance Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra Throu. Govt Pleader and Ors.

Amogh Tushar Joshi vs K Talsania Constructions

Mohammed Shakeel Khamker Alias Pathan vs Lotus Engicons Private Limited

Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. vs the State of Maharashtra