Writ petition against a stay order passed by the Divisional Commissioner in an RTS appeal without hearing the petitioner. The court did not examine merit and disposed of the petition by directing the Divisional Commissioner to decide the appeal within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:7710
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4286/2024
Omprakash Girdharilal Tekdiwal ...Versus…
The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and others
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 19/07/2024
2
respondent No.1 to decide the appeal itself. Respondent No.1 - the learned Divisional Commissioner shall endeavour to decide the appeal in question within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
Wadkar
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Divisional Commissioner's order staying the Additional Collector's decision be examined on merit, or should the appeal itself be directed to be decided afresh?
Omprakash Girdharilal Tekdiwal
The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati
Respondent No.2
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
