This judgment concludes two writ petitions by the Bombay High Court bench at Aurangabad, finding them rendered infructuous based on counsel's submission without detailed reasoning. The petitions were disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:25462
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
213 WRIT PETITION NO. 4233 OF 1994
GODAWARI DUDHANA SAHAKARI SAKHER KARKHNA LTD. VERSUS
ASHOK RAJABHAU DEASLKAR,AND OTHERS.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D.S. Bhapkar h/f. Mr. V.D. Salunke AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.N. Lokhande
216 WRIT PETITION NO. 2570 OF 1998
GODAWARI DUDANA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.
VERSUS
GANESH EKNATH TEKALE
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D.S. Bhapkar h/f. Mr. V.D. Salunke AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.N. Lokhande
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : October 17, 2024
PER COURT :-
submits that the writ petitions are rendered infructuous.
as infructuous.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
ssc/
Godawari Dudhana Sahakari Sakher Karkhna Ltd.
Ashok Rajabhu Deaslkar
Ganesh Eknath Tekale
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
