A 2016 writ petition was never circulated or prosecuted by the petitioner for eight years; the High Court dismissed it for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM
V.A. Tikam 33- WP 423 of 2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2024.02.07 11:58:18 +0530
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 423 OF 2016.
Hemendra Bosmiya .. Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mrs. A.A. Takalkar, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 1st FEBRUARY, 2024
It appears that, Petitioner is not interested in pursuing present Petition.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Hemendra Bosmiya
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
