High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed two connected writ petitions as not pressed on the day of hearing on 23.04.2024.
Writ petitions dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:8878
1
4193.24WP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 WRIT PETITION NO. 4193 OF 2024
MOHAMMAD FAISAL FAROOQUI MOHAMMAD KHURSHID FAROOQUI
VERSUS
PREMILABAI RAJMAL OSTWAL THROUGH POA VINODKUMAR RAJMAL OSTWAL
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv.N.K.Tungar
WITH
912 WRIT PETITION NO. 4197 OF 2024
MOHAMMAD FAISAL FAROOQUI MOHAMMAD KHURSHID FAROOQUI
VERSUS
PREMILABAI RAJMAL OSTWAL THROUGH POA VINODKUMAR RAJMAL OSTWAL
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv.N.K.Tungar
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 23.04.2024
P.C. :
1] The learned counsel for the petitioners has not pressed the present writ petitions.
2] In view of the same, the present Writ Petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
DDC
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE
MOHAMMAD FAISAL FAROOQUI MOHAMMAD KHURSHID FAROOQUI
PREMILABAI RAJMAL OSTWAL
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
