Writ petition disposed as withdrawn after petitioner's advocate reported that petitioner and respondents had reconciled and settled their disputes before Lokadalat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40.WP.4192.2021.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4192 OF 2021
Apurva Abhijit Patil .. Petitioner
Versus Corp.Bank Home Ltd. Through its Manager and Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : MAY 07, 2024
P.C.:
1. Mentioned out of turn.
2. Heard Mr. Udane, learned Advocate appearing for the
Petitioner.
3. He would submit that Petitioner and Respondents have reconciled and settled their disputes before Lokadalat. This statement made by Mr. Udane on instructions is recorded.
4. In view of the above, Writ Petition stands disposed as
withdrawn.
H. H. SAWANT
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
HARSHADA Digitally signed byHARSHADA HANUMANTSAWANT HANUMANT SAWANTDate: 2024.05.0715:09:57 +0530
1 of 1
Apurva Abhijit Patil
Corp.Bank Home Ltd. Through its Manager
Ors.
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
