The petitioner approached the High Court complaining that the Central Government Industrial Tribunal at Mumbai is not functioning. The Court listed the petition for further directions and noted the need for the Additional Solicitor General's assistance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JPP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4116 OF 2024
Maharashtra Navanirman Kamgar Sena
… Petitioner
V/s.
The Employees Provident Fund Organization & Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Dishang Shah i/b. Vinod Shetty for the Petitioner Ms. Shehnaz V. Bharucha for Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 05 SEPTEMBER 2024
P.C. :-
Principal grievance of the Petitioner is that the Central Government Industrial Tribunal is not functioning at Mumbai. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Provident Fund Organization inform that earlier, in a Petition raising similar grievance after hearing the learned Additional Solicitor General, certain directions have been issued by this Court. The situation has not improved.
JPP
2
M.M. SATHAYE, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Digitally signed by JYOTI JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date:2024.09.06 11:28:20 +0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be entitled to seek directions for the functioning of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal at Mumbai.
Maharashtra Navanirman Kamgar Sena
The Employees Provident Fund Organization
Ors.
Nitin Jamdar
M. M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
