Writ petitions concerning Family Court proceedings were disposed of as withdrawn after counsel submitted they had become infructuous, the underlying proceedings having been decided on 28 September 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
3 - WP 4103 OF 2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.02.1410:54:55 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4103 OF 2016
ALONGWITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 13333 OF 2016
Madhuri Amit Patil
VERSUS
...Petitioner
Suresh Laxman Kelkar & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Shubham Gangan i/b. Mr.Harshad Sathe for the Petitioners.
Mr.Dushyant Purekar for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 9 FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
Mr. Gangan, learned counsel holding for advocate Mr.Sathe
for the petitioner/wife, submits that these petitions have become
infructuous as the proceedings before the Family Court have been
disposed of by an order dated 28 September, 2018.
2. Writ petitions are disposed of as withdrawn.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Madhuri Amit Patil
Suresh Laxman Kelkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court