Petitioner challenged orders allowing amendment of cheque number in a complaint and dismissal of his revision. With trial unconcluded, court held petitioner's rights not seriously affected; he may raise illegality on merit. Petition dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:16841
957-CrWP-410-24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 410 OF 2024
JANARDHAN RAMDHAN RATHOD VERSUS RAJU BAPU SHINDE
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Bagal holding for Mr. Bharat N. Gadegaonkar
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J. DATE : 01-08-2024
PER COURT :-
957-CrWP-410-24.odt
2
revision was preferred before the Sessions Court. The learned Sessions Court dismissed the revision. Against the said order, the petitioner is before the Court.
( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE
rrd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to allow correction of the cheque number in the complaint after evidence was led.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Janardhan Ramdhan Rathod
Raju Bapu Shinde
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
