Petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal writ petition after learning his extension application was rejected. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file afresh and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Liberty granted to petitioner to file the petition afresh; petition withdrawn without prejudice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:5429-DB
1 1.wp.409.24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 409/2024 Ankit Shivbaran Shahu
Vs.
Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and Anr.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Ms. Ratna Singh, Advocate for Petitioner.
Ms. N. R. Tripathi, A.P.P. for Respondents/State.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 06/05/2024.
. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks for withdrawal with liberty to file afresh as the petitioner has been informed that his extension application has been rejected.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
RGurnule
Ankit Shivbaran Shahu
Divisional Commissioner, Amravati
Anr.
Vinay Joshi
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
