A one-line procedural order; by consent the writ petition was stood over to 20/08/2024. No substantive adjudication.
A one-line procedural order; by consent the writ petition was stood over to 20/08/2024. No substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4089 OF 2024
In
STAMP NO. OF
Siddharth S/o Adinath Ukey ....PETITIONER
V/S
The State Of Maharashtra, Department Of ....RESPONDENT Irrigation, Mumbai Thr. Secretary And Others
VIKRAM PRABHAKAR MARPAKWAR for Petitioner for Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NITIN W. SAMBRE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ
DATE : 6th August, 2024
P.C. :
BY CONSENT S.O. TO 20/08/2024.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL )
Page 1/1
Siddharth S/o Adinath Ukey
The State Of Maharashtra, Department Of Irrigation, Mumbai Thr. Secretary And Others
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
