Disposed

Siddhart S/O. Marotrao Gaikwad and Others v. the Registrar General of Money Lenders and Special Registrar for Co-Op. Societies, Pune and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Dec 2024WP/4019/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged rejection of his revision under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Money Lending Act as maintainable-only on the basis of a High Court decision since recalled in review. Court set aside the impugned order and directed fresh decision on merits within four months.

What the court decided

AI extract

Siddhart S/O. Marotrao Gaikwad and Others Vs the Registrar General of Money Lenders and Special Registrar for Co-Op. Societies, Pune and Ors. — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

937-wp-4019-24(j).odt

¶2

¶3

2024:BHC-NAG:14167

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶5

Writ Petition (WP) No. 4019 of 2024

¶6

Siddhart S/o Marotrao Gaikwad and others

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Registrar General of Money Lenders and Special Registrar for Cooperative Societies and others

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶10

Shri S.I.Ghatte, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Prachi Joshi, AGP for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. Shri V.B.Bhise, Advocate for the respondent no.4.

¶11

CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 11^th DECEMBER, 2024.

¶12

This petition takes exception to the order dated 28^th May, 2024 passed by the respondent no.1 in Revision No. 43 of 2022.

¶13

By the order impugned, in view of the decision of this Court dated 24^th April, 2024 in Writ Petition No. 14389 of 2019, the respondent no.1 has dismissed the revision filed by the present petitioner under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014, as not maintainable.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to the order dated 12^th September, 2024

¶15

SKNair

¶16

2 937-wp-4019-24(j).odt

¶17

passed by this Court in Review Application 196 of 2024. By the said order, this Court has recalled the decision dated 24^th April, 2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 14389 of 2019.

¶18

In that view of the matter, the following order is passed.

¶19

i. The order impugned is set aside. ii. Respondent no.1 shall decide the Revision Application No. 43 of 2022 filed by the present petitioner on it’s own merits.

¶20

iii. The parties shall appear before the respondent no.1 on 9^th January, 2025.

¶21

iv. Needless to mention that the interim order which was passed by the respondent no.1 shall remain in operation till the decision of the revision.

¶22

v. Respondent no.1 shall endeavour to decide the revision within a period of four months from the date of appearance of the parties.

¶23

The writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid

¶24

terms.

¶25

[N.R.BORKAR, J.]

¶26

SKNair

Siddhart S/O. Marotrao Gaikwad and Others v. the Registrar General of Money Lenders and Special Registrar for Co-Op. Societies, Pune and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Siddhart S/O. Marotrao Gaikwad and Others v. the Registrar General of Money Lenders and Special Registrar for Co-Op. Societies, Pune and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Akola Vs Golusingh Tukaram Rathod (Since Dead) through Its Lrs. and Another

Deorao S/O Natthuji Karunadhan Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Civil and Food Supply, Mumbai and Others

Smt. Chindabai W/O Fattu Gajbhe and Another Vs Manoj S/O. Tularamji Bhande

Prem S/O. Parashram Rathod Vs the Additional Collector, Yavatmal and Ors.

Bhartidevi Wd/O Motiram Moryani Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Department of State Excise, Mumbai and Ors.

Sau. Yamuna W/O. Narendra Jetha, Thr. P.O.a., Shri. Narendra S/O Govindlalji Jetha Vs Shri Ajay S/O Balkrishna Petkar and Others