Writ petition challenging GST registration was disposed of as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the registration had been restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.WP4012_2023.DOC
2024:BHC-AS:11775-DB
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4012 OF 2023
Amit Khanderao Mudvikar … Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-I)& Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Shankargouda S. Patil for the petitioner. Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra a/s. Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma for the respondent.
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED: 11 March, 2024
P.C.
registration of the petitioner, which is subject matter of challenge in the present proceedings, have been restored. Hence, further adjudication of the petition is not called for.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI , J.)
Page 1 of 1 11 March, 2024
Signed by: Vidya S. Amin Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/03/2024 11:05:49
Amit Khanderao Mudvikar
The Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-I)
Anr.
G. S. Kulkarni
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
