Writ petition sought direction to expedite hearing of a domestic violence complaint pending cross-examination. The court found no exceptional circumstances, noting the next date was already fixed, relied on Supreme Court precedent against such directions, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURU RAJGURU Date: 2024.09.23 09:58:36 +0530
69-wp-4001-2024.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4001 OF 2024
Rupali Sandeep Kadam … Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors … Respondents
Mr. Rajan Gurnani i/b. K.C. Tiwari, for Petitioner. Ms. Shagufta for the Respondent. Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 20th SEPTEMBER 2024
ORDER :-
Page no. 1 of 2
69-wp-4001-2024.doc
exceptional circumstances to issue any directions as prayed in the petition.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
1 2024 SCC OnLine SC 207
Page no. 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to expedite the hearing of a complaint under the Domestic Violence Act pending cross-examination.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of U.P. and OrsRelied on
2024 SCC OnLine SC 207 · Who else cites this
Rupali Sandeep Kadam
The State of Maharashtra and Ors
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
