The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition based on appropriate pleadings, as the final notification was not enclosed.
Withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
402-WP-3972-2024
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3972 OF 2024
Shuaib Basheer Khatib .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. M. A. Vaid, Ms. Vidhya N. Shet i/by Vaid & Associates for petitioner. Mr. Vishal S. Khanavkar, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 4- State.
Ms. Jaya Bagwe for respondent no.2-MPCB.
Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w Mr. Arun Panickar and Arthav Sanghvi for respondent no.5.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATE: 23rd AUGUST, 2024
P.C.:
1. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition.
2. The petitioner relies upon a draft notification issued by the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board inviting suggestions and objections from public and the very basis of the petition is the said draft notification, however, the final notification has not been enclosed with the writ petition.
1
402-WP-3972-2024
3. In the aforesaid view, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
4. If the petitioner files any fresh petition, it should be based on appropriate pleadings.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2024.08.23 16:18:07 +0530
2
Shuaib Basheer Khatib
State of Maharashtra
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
