Single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition seeking direction to expedite pending charity appeals, holding that repeated expedited orders were unnecessary after prior directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:536-DB
395.24wp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
974 WRIT PETITION NO. 395 OF 2024
SHRI. BALKRISHNA DAMODHAR AMRUTKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr V. S. Bedre, Advocate for Petitioner; Mr S. B. Narwade, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 10th January, 2024
PER COURT:
395.24wp (2)
Nos.01/2010, 01/2011, 61/2020, 01/2021, 02/2021, 03/2021 and 04/2021.
(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order expediting pending appeals was necessary when the proceedings had already been expedited by this Court earlier.
SHRI. BALKRISHNA DAMODHAR AMRUTKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, PUNE
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
