Partly allowed

Bijabai Sunil Waghmare and Others v. Shankar Shravan Lende and Others

Bombay HC25 Sept 2024WP/3910/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging an order appointing a Court Commissioner to measure suit properties, the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, upheld the appointment but quashed the portion requiring petitioners to bear measurement expenses.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order to the extent requiring petitioners to pay measurement expenses is quashed and set aside. Otherwise affirmed.

Bijabai Sunil Waghmare and Others Vs Shankar Shravan Lende… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

wp3910.24.O.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3910 OF 2024

¶5

(Ms. Bijabai Sunil Waghmare and others Vs. Shankar Shravan Lende and others)

¶6

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar’s Orders.

¶7

Mr. U. A. Gosavi, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. A. Y. Yerkhede, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 3, 5 to 8 & 11 to 14. Mr. Y. N. Thengre, Advocate for Respondent Nos.16 & 17.

¶8

CORAM: N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER, 2024.

¶9

This petition takes exception to the order dated 23^rd April, 2024 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kuhi below Exhibit-84 in Regular Civil Suit No.94/2023.

¶10

By the order impugned the learned trial Court has allowed the application filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 15 original defendant Nos.4 to 18 for appointment of Court Commissioner to measure the suit properties.

¶11

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are already two measurement reports on the record of the trial court. It is submitted that the trial Court therefore, erred in allowing the application.

¶13

wp3910.24.O.odt

¶14

¶15

In the alternative it is submitted that even otherwise the petitioners who are co-defendants can not be asked to bear the expenses for measurement.

¶16

On the other hand the learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 15 submits that the trial Court has rightly allowed the application.

¶17

I have perused the impugned order. Considering the nature of dispute between the parties, the learned trial Court has rightly allowed the application. However, the petitioners can not be asked to pay the expenses for the measurement. The impugned order to that extent is therefore, quashed and set aside.

¶18

The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

¶19

(N. R. BORKAR, J.)

¶20

NSN

Bijabai Sunil Waghmare and Others v. Shankar Shravan Lende and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bijabai Sunil Waghmare and Others v. Shankar Shravan Lende and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Mul, Chandrapur Vs Ashok S/O Ramuji Kadukar and Others

The Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Mul, Chandrapur Vs Ayubkhan S/O Dildarkhan Pathan and Others

The Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Mul, Chandrapur Vs Maroti S/O Karuji Sherki and Others

Shahaji Bira Solankar vs the State of Maharashtra

Yuvraj Dilip Sagale (Minor) Thr. Natural Guardian Mohter, Sau. Manisha Dilip Sagale and Others Vs Kamlabai Shridharsa Sagale and Others

Rahul Vinod Patil vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.