Union of India challenged a Central Administrative Tribunal judgment in a service dispute; facts mirrored an identical petition dismissed the same day. The court dismissed this petition and directed compliance with the Tribunal order within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAMPRAVINRAO SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO Date:2024.03.22 18:00:38 +0530
1 906-WP-3819-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3819 OF 2024
Union of India … Petitioner
V/s.
Suresh D. Narsale … Respondent
Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra a/w Ashutosh Mishra, Satyaprakash Sharma for Petitioner.
Mr. Vishal P. Shirke a/w Aditya P. Shirke for Respondent.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATED : 21st MARCH, 2024
P.C. :
and Mr. Shirke, learned counsel representing the Respondent.
consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been taken up for final hearing.
1 of 2
Shubham
2 906-WP-3819-2024.doc
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 of 2
Shubham
Union of India
Suresh D. Narsale
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
