Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal writ petition in view of contentions made in the reply; the court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:12419-DB
1 02-cr.wp 374.2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 374 OF 2023
( Dattu s/o Dondiba Gaikwad vs. State of Maharashtra and others )
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr. P.R.Agrawal, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs.S.V.Kolhe, APP for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 12, 2024
( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) ( VINAY JOSHI, J. )
KOLHE
Dattu s/o Dondiba Gaikwad
State of Maharashtra
Vinay Joshi
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
