The High Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from an FIR for dowry cruelty and breach of trust, accepting the parties' amicable settlement and the respondent wife's consent to quash the proceedings.
Quashing of Criminal Proceedings bearing C.C. No. 1443/PW/2021 arising out of F.I.R. No. 336 of 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Gitalaxmi 31-wp-3734-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3734 OF 2024
Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 are residing at Kadiyadara, Sabarkantha, Gujarat:383440.
Vs.
Mr. Siddharth Singh a/w Mr. Anil Chauhan i/b Mr. Manoj Singh for the Petitioners.
Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. Sachin Daga (Through V.C.) for Respondent No. 2.
1/3
Gitalaxmi 31-wp-3734-2024.doc
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 30th AUGUST 2024.
P.C.:-
2/3
Gitalaxmi 31-wp-3734-2024.doc
Respondent No. 2 has given her no objection to quash the subject F.I.R. The Respondent No. 2 states that, the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(A. S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by GITALAXMI GITALAXMI KRISHNA KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2024.09.03 10:29:43 +0530
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings and F.I.R. should be quashed in view of the amicable settlement and the respondent wife's consent affidavit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Paresh Vinodchandra Panchal
Mr. Vinod Chandra Panchal
Mrs. Sulochana Vinodchandra Panchal
Mrs. Mita Rajesh Panchal
The State of Maharashtra
Mrs. Falguni Paresh Panchal
A. S. GADKARI
DR. NEELA GOKHALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
