Amol Krishnakant Salvi v. Kavita Krishnakant Salvi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as he was unrepresented at the hearing.
What did the court decide?
None. Petition dismissed.
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as he was unrepresented at the hearing.
None. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Wp-3730-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3730 OF 2022
Amol Krishnakant Salvi. ...Petitioner.
Versus
Kavita Krishnakant Salvi and Others.
...Respondents.
Ms. Rumana Bagadi for respondent no.1. Ms. Kajle, APP for the respondent-State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : January 16, 2024.
P. C. :
1. None appears for the petitioner. Even on last occasion, none had appeared for the petitioner. Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Amol Krishnakant Salvi
Kavita Krishnakant Salvi
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court