Disposed

Malta D/O Sakharam Yermule @ Madhuri W/O Chagan Marke v. the State of Maharashtra, General Administration Dept., Mumbai Thr. Prin. Secretary and Others

Bombay HC7 Aug 2024WP/3594/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, an Assistant Midwife whose termination was partially quashed by the Divisional Commissioner, challenged a subsequent order placing her services on a supernumerary post. The court found that an appeal lay under Rule 14 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with liberty to approach the Appellate Authority under Rule 14 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964.

Malta D/O Sakharam Yermule @ Madhuri W/O Chagan Marke… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:8715-DB

¶2

905wp3594.24.odt 1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3594 OF 2024

¶5

(Malta d/o Sakharam Yermule .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

¶7

and Registrar's Orders.

¶8

Shri Ashish Chaware, Advocate for petitioner, Shri D.P. Thakre, Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶9

C ORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. D ATE : 07.08.2024.

¶10

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶11

After appointment of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Midwife from Scheduled Tribe category, her services were terminated on August 18, 2017 as her tribe validity claim was rejected on September 28, 2016.

¶12

An appeal preferred by the petitioner, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 14 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, the Divisional Commissioner allowed the said appeal vide order dated December 28, 2018 and directed her reinstatement.

¶13

In view of change in the policy of the State Government, the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana

¶14

905wp3594.24.odt 2/2

¶15

passed an order thereby placing the services of the petitioner on a supernumerary post vide order dated July 25, 2022.

¶16

The impugned order has an impact on the change in the service conditions of the petitioner and as such, the remedy of appeal under Rule 14 (1) (a) of the above referred Rules is very much available to the petitioner. That being so, we dispose of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority, which appeal be decided expeditiously, if so preferred.

¶17

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶18

Gulande

¶19

Signed by: A.S. GULANDE Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 08/08/2024 19:07:18

Malta D/O Sakharam Yermule @ Madhuri W/O Chagan Marke v. the State of Maharashtra, General Administration Dept., Mumbai Thr. Prin. Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malta D/O Sakharam Yermule @ Madhuri W/O Chagan Marke v. the State of Maharashtra, General Administration Dept., Mumbai Thr. Prin. Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachin S/O Madhavrao Ladke Vs Ravindra Katolkar, the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Nagpur and Ors.

Pravin Rajesh Dhanvijay Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of School Education, Mumbai and 4 Other

Rushiji S/O Sambaji Raut and Another Vs Vijay S/O Syhriram Bagmare and Another

Maharashtra Arogya Vikas Bahuudeshiya Sanstha, through Secretary Mr. Ajay Madhukarrao Hanumante Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Higher and Technical Education Dept. Mumbai and or

M/S Abhinav Seeds Company through Partner Arun Kisanrao Wagh Vs the Union of India through Finance Minister and Others

Shivaja Baliram Tomake and Others Vs the District Collector, Yavatmal and Others