Writ petition by a petitioner against MCGM; counsel sought leave to withdraw and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, deciding nothing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 501 wp 3546.21 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3546 OF 2021
SANDEEP EKNATH PATIL ....PETITIONER V/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI ....RESPONDENT
Mr. Vidula Patil with Mr. Prakash Devdas i/b M/s. P.V. Legal Solutions for the Petitioner.
Mr. R.Y. Sirsat for Respondent/MCGM.
Sandeep E. Patil – Petitioner present in Court.
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2024.
P.C.:
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, who is personally present before the Court, seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM RAJALINGAM KATKAM KATKAM Date: 2024.02.17 11:02:12 +0530
1/1
katkam
Sandeep Eknath Patil
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
