Single judge Writ Petition challenging the single judge Writ Petition challenging the trial court's order allowing amendment of plaint to include a subsequent agreement. Bench dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed; trial court's order allowing amendment application is maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 914
2024:BHC-AUG:7420
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
914 WRIT PETITION NO. 3510 OF 2024
MARUTI MUKUNDA UDMALE AND ANOTHER VERSUS
HANMANT MUKUNDA UDMALE
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. V. G. Kodale
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 05th APRIL, 2024
PER COURT:
2 914
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
marathe
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in allowing the amendment of plaint to bring subsequent agreement dated 27.05.2021 on record
Whether the subsequent agreement lacks legal sanctity due to non-registration and lis pendens
MARUTI MUKUNDA UDMALE AND ANOTHER
HANMANT MUKUNDA UDMALE
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
