Gayatri Nangia v. Directorate of Enforcement
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of a prior order (WP No. 2396 of 2023) dated the same day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-OS-WP-343-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 343 OF 2024
Gayatri Nangia … Petitioner
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement …Respondent
Mr. Ameya Deosthale i/b. Stratage Law Partners for the Petitioner. Mr. Shreeram Shirsat SPP a/w Ms. Tanvi Mate, Mr. Shekhar Mane, Mr. Nishad Mokashi, Ms. Karishma Rajesh for the Respondent ED .
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED: 28 February, 2024 _______________________
P.C.
by our order passed today in Writ Petition No.2396 of 2023.
passed in Writ Petition No.2396 of 2023.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI , J.)
Digitally signed by VINA VINA ARVIND ARVIND KHADPE KHADPE Date: 2024.02.29 14:40:55 +0530
Page 1 of 1 28 February, 2024
Vina Khadpe
Gayatri Nangia
Directorate of Enforcement
G. S. Kulkarni
Firdosh P. Pooniwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court