Petitioner and respondent settled amicable dispute via joint compromise. High Court dismissed petition on terms of settlement.
Petition disposed of on terms of joint compromise; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1 58.wp3425.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3425 OF 2024
Shubhanshu Sharad Joshi Vs. The Competent Authority, Nagpur and anr.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. Parth Sagdeo, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Prachi Joshi, AGP for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Abhijit Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 29.08.2024.
Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2 jointly submits that the petitioner and respondent No. 2 have amicably settled the dispute in terms of joint pursis dated 31.07.2024. It is submitted that the present petition be disposed of in terms of joint pursis.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
Prity
Shubhanshu Sharad Joshi
The Competent Authority, Nagpur
anr.
N.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
