Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition; the Bench disposed of the petition as withdrawn, expressly noting it was not heard on merits and all contentions of the parties remain open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5 wp 3372 of 2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3372 OF 2023
Ishan Ashok Fadake... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
Through P.P. Office, High Court and Ors....Respondents
Mr.Brijesh Pathak, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.R.M. Pethe, A.P.P for the Respondents–State.
Mr.Mandar Lalsare, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 5thJANUARY 2024
P.C.:
Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions of
the Petitioner, seeks to withdraw the Petition. Writ Petition is
accordingly disposed of, as withdrawn.
2We make it clear that we have not heard the Petition
on merits and as such all contentions of all the parties are kept
RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date: 2024.01.05 17:48:20 +0530
open.
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
Rajeshri Aher
Ishan Ashok Fadake
The State of Maharashtra Through P.P. Office, High Court
Revati Mohite Dere
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court