Petitioner challenged disqualification order of respondents elected as village panchayat members. The Court held that since the election term ended, the petition became infructuous and disposed of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
954-wp-3310-2023.odt
(1)
2024:BHC-AUG:17563
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2023
RAVINDRA VASANT KALE VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
Mr. Sachin B. Solanke, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. Avinash A. Khande, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 07th AUGUST, 2024.
P.C.:-
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE
Devendra/August-2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging disqualification from village panchayat election remains maintainable after the election term has expired.
Ravindra Vasant Kale
The Additional Divisional Commissioner And Others
S. G. Chapalgaonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
