Writ petition admitting vague representation, disposing of petition without adjudicating substantive merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 24-WP 331-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 331 OF 2021
Yamunabai Dattraya Sanap and others -- Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra and others --Respondents
Mr. K. S. Narwade, Advocate for Petitioners. Ms. Kalyani Deshpande, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 01 FEBRUARY 2021
P. C. :
By this Petition, the Petitioners are praying for a writ of mandamus to the Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra to look into their complaint made on 10 September 2020 in respect of Respondent No.3 Bank. It is stated that Respondent No.3 Bank is avoiding to extend the benefits to the Petitioners as per the Scheme.
KOLHE
as would be necessary to enable the Chief Secretary to appreciate exactly where the Respondent Banks have failed to act.
4. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
KOLHE
Yamunabai Dattraya Sanap and others
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
