The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition via written instructions and a power of attorney. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of pending civil applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:12255
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3307 OF 1998
NOOR KHAN MUSTAFA KHAN DIED THROUGH LRS
VERSUS
MARATHWADA WAKF BOARD, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
Ms. Ashwini R. Mate, Advocate h/f Ms. M.S. Mhase, Advocate for petitioners Mr. A.S. Shinde, AGP for respondent No.10
CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATE : 25th JUNE, 2024
ORDER :
2 The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners places on record written instructions received from Mr. Rahimoddin Toufiq Faruki, who holds Power of Attorney for other petitioners seeking withdrawal of the petition. The copy of written instructions dated 19.06.2024 along with the
copy of Power of Attorney is taken on record and marked as Exh. ‘ X ’. In that
view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending
civil applications stand disposed of.
( S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE
agd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed or dismissed?
NOOR KHAN MUSTAFA KHAN DIED THROUGH LRS
MARATHWADA WAKF BOARD, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
