Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a criminal writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings before the proper forum.
Liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate Forum/Court as maintainable in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 23 wp 315 of 2024(2).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.315 OF 2024
Dyaneshwar Shantaram Rode….Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.….Respondents
Mr.Sachin R. Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.K.V. Saste, Addl. P.P. for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 4th APRIL 2024.
P.C. :
1 Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw this Petition. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed, as
withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the
appropriate Forum/Court, as maintainable in law.
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI RAJESHRI PRAKASH PRAKASH AHER AHER Date: 2024.04.22 14:43:54 +0530
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE J.
This order is corrected pursuant to the Speaking to the Minutes order dated 16th April, 2024.
Rajeshri Aher
Dyaneshwar Shantaram Rode
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court