Vikrant D. Harawade v. D.V. Chivilkar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition in default as the petitioner was absent and no advocate appeared on the merits date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:17672
51.3102.17 wp.docx
Iresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3102 OF 2017
Vikrant D. Harawade .....Petitioner
Vs.
D. V. Chivlikar and Ors .....Respondents
None for the petitioner
Mr. Subhash Bane i/b ms. Neha Bane for respondent nos. 1 and 17 Smt. Sulbha Chipde AGP for the State
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 15th APRIL 2024
P.C.
“1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is bed ridden and hence, he is unable to take instructions to file an application for discharge. By way of last chance, he seeks two weeks time to take steps.
1/2
51.3102.17 wp.docx
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Signed by: Iresh S. Mashal Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 17/04/2024 14:48:24
Vikrant D. Harawade
D. V. Chivlikar
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court