Disposed

Champadevi Sudarshan Paswan and Ors. v. the Managing Director Cidco Ltd.

Bombay HC16 Jan 2024WP/310/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought relief against CIDCO regarding allotment of an alternate plot of land. After hearing for some time, counsel sought leave to withdraw with liberty to make a representation to CIDCO based on its 2011 communication; the petition was withdrawn with contentions kept open and liberty to file a suit.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw with freedom to seek alternate plot from CIDCO and to file suit; representation to be considered per law and CIDCO Rules.

Champadevi Sudarshan Paswan and Ors. Vs the Managing… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed byPRASHANT PRASHANT VILAS VILAS RANE RANE Date: 2024.01.17 15:36:27 +0530

¶2

501wp310-24.odt

¶3

pvr

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 310 OF 2024

¶7

Champadevi Sudarshan Paswan & Ors. ..Petitioners Versus The Managing Director, CIDCO Ltd. ..Respondent

¶8

Mr. Shyamrishi Pathak, for Petitioners.

¶9

Mr. Nitin Gangal, for Respondent-CIDCO.

¶10

__________ CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE : 16 JANUARY 2024.

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

1. After this petition was heard for some time, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the CIDCO requesting for allotment of alternate plot of land, in view of the communication dated 3 August 2011 addressed by the CIDCO to the Batubai Zopadpatti Rahiwashi, Opposite Aayakar Colony, Sector 21, 22, Belapur, Navi Mumbai.

¶13

2. Allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.

¶14

3. Needless to observe that in the event the petitioners make a

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

16 January 2024

¶17

501wp310-24.odt

¶18

representation, the same shall be considered by the CIDCO in accordance with law and as per the CIDCO Rules.

¶19

4. We also keep open remedy of the petitioners to file suit in the event it is so felt appropriate.

¶20

5. Disposed of. No costs.

¶21

[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]

¶22

[G. S. KULKARNI, J.]

¶23

Page 2 of 2

¶24

16 January 2024

Champadevi Sudarshan Paswan and Ors. v. the Managing Director Cidco Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Champadevi Sudarshan Paswan and Ors. v. the Managing Director Cidco Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dream Woodly Interio Ltd. and Anr. Vs Union of India Thr the Secretary Dept of Revenue Ministry of Finance and Ors.

Tushar Kumar Chhaganlal Kothiya Proprietor of Tulip Turnomatic Vs Union of India through Its Secretary and Anr.

Railroad Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and 6 Ors.

Bank of Mahrashtra Vs the Directorate of Revenue Interlligence

Sachin Shivaji Thombare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Anmol Singh Sethi Vs Union of India Thr Secretary and Ors.