This court disposed of Writ Petition No. 3091 of 2011 as infructuous after being informed that the underlying regular civil suit No. 228 of 2008 had been settled by mediation.
Writ Petition disposed as infructuous. No specific relief recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
268.WP.3091.2011.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3091 OF 2011
Lalita Sanjay Koli and Anr. .. Petitioners Versus Sanjay Bapuso Koli and Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2024
P.C.:
1. Mentioned out of turn.
2. Heard Mr. Lahankar, learned Advocate for Petitioners and
Mr. Raje Nimbalkar, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 to 8.
3. Writ Petition concerns challenge to interlocutory order dated
14.06.2010 below Exhibit-28 passed by learned Trial Court in Regular Civil Suit No.228 of 2008.
4. Both learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties have placed before me case status of the subject suit before the learned
Trial Court which states that suit has been settled by Mediation.
1 of 2
268.WP.3091.2011.doc
5. Both the learned Advocates would submit that the Writ
Petition has become infructuous.
6. In that view of the matter, Writ Petition is disposed as
infructuous.
H. H. SAWANT
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed by HARSHADA HARSHADA HANUMANT HANUMANTSAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.09.02 14:26:33 +0530
2 of 2
Lalita Sanjay Koli and Anr.
Sanjay Bapuso Koli and Ors.
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
