Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear or prosecute the petition; the bench listed it for dismissal and then dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp29.24.O.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.29 OF 2024
(Ramu s/o Chintaman Tatte Vs. Bhagwan s/o Ganpat Daf and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar’s Orders.
Mr. S. A. Dutonde, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. Syed Sufiyan, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. M. A. Vishnu, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM: N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER, 2024.
This Court on 12th September, 2024 had passed the following order:
None for the petitioner. List the matter under the caption for ‘Dismissal’ on 25th September, 2024.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
NSN
Ramu s/o Chintaman Tatte
Bhagwan s/o Ganpat Daf
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
