Late Yashodabai Naik (Pawar) Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Yavatmal and Ors. v. the State of Maha. Thr. Its Sec. Dept. of School Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC29 Apr 2024WP/2797/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court, in a writ petition filed by trusts running schools, observes the claim that the State Government failed to release reimbursement funds for government-sponsored students as per RTE Act. The court issues notice to respondents.

What the court decided

AI extract

Late Yashodabai Naik (Pawar) Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

16-WP-2797-2024.odt 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2797 of 2024

¶3

Late Yashodabai Naik (Pawar) Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Va Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Bori (E) and others.

¶4

vs.

¶5

The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶7

Shri B. G. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioners. Shri S. M. Ukey, Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos.1, 3 to 5.

¶8

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE :- 29^th APRIL, 2024.

¶9

Shri B. G. Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, who are public Trusts and the societies registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, submits that the petitioners-Trusts are running primary schools. According to him, pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 (c) and 12(2) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (for short, said Act), the petitioners are admitting students to the extent of 25% of sanctioned quota as are sponsored by the State Government. According to him, pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of the said Act, the respondent-Central Government reimbursed the fees receivable as against 25% of the admissions through the State Government. He would claim that though the State Government has already received funds for the academic session 2019-20 and subsequent years, it has not released the same in favour of the petitioners neither for the academic session 2019-20 nor for subsequent years.

¶10

In view of above, issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 24.06.2024

¶11

Shri S. M. Ukey, learned Additional Government Pleader waives service of notice for the respondent nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5.

¶12

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶13

Signed by: Jayant S. Andurkar Andurkar. Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 29/04/2024 16:06:46

Late Yashodabai Naik (Pawar) Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Yavatmal and Ors. v. the State of Maha. Thr. Its Sec. Dept. of School Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Late Yashodabai Naik (Pawar) Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Yavatmal and Ors. v. the State of Maha. Thr. Its Sec. Dept. of School Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sanjiv Kumar S/O Liladhar Bisen and Others vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Mayuri W/O. Ravindra Meshram vs Coal India Limited, Thr. Its Chairman, Jbcci-Xi, Rajarghat, Kolkatta and Others

Asha Anil Khandagale and Others vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, New Delhi and Others

Kantappa S/O Bhimrayya Khot vs Shri Anup Kumar, Additional Chief Secretary, Dept. of Agri., Animal Husbandary, Dairy Dev. and Ors.

Virendra S/O Devidas Dafe vs Principal Secretary Urban Development-I, Mumbai and Others

Tarachand Sambhaji Bawankule and Others vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Collector, Chandrapur and Others